On 29/Apr/11 19:39, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Here’s a more comprehensive proposal for an output summary (excuse the > “diff” output): > > +4.9. Output Requirements > + > + For each signature that verifies successfully or produces a TEMPFAIL > + result, the output of a DKIM verifier module MUST include the set of: > + > + o The domain name, taken from the "d=" signature tag; and > + > + o The result of the verification attempt for that signature. > + > + The output MAY include other signature properties or result meta-data > + for use by modules that consume those results.
How about mentioning ignored signatures, e.g., The output MAY include further data, such as properties or result meta-data of any signatures, including ignored ones, for use by modules that consume those results at any stage of the verification process. (Just to make clear that all the "SHOULD ignore" are not conflicting with this.) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
