On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:39:03 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy <m...@cloudmark.com> wrote:
> Right before Section 6: > + Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL > + result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present in > + the message. ... s/Verifiers SHOULD ignore/Identity assessors SHOULD ignore/ (and probably in other places too). Veriffiers are explicitly instructed to return PERMFAIL/TEMPFAIL), and "returning" something is evidently inconsistent with "ignoring" it. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: c...@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
