> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:08 PM > To: Charles Lindsey > Cc: DKIM > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output requirements > > >> + Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL > >> + result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present > in > >> + the message. ... > > > > s/Verifiers SHOULD ignore/Identity assessors SHOULD ignore/ > > > > (and probably in other places too). Verifiers are explicitly instructed > > to return PERMFAIL/TEMPFAIL), and "returning" something is evidently > > inconsistent with "ignoring" it. > > +1
Since this is already somewhat mushy, might I suggest: Verifiers MAY decline to report, and identity assessors SHOULD ignore, ... _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
