On 25/May/11 18:42, Hector Santos wrote: > Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> Yes, dot is one of the punctuation characters that should be removed. > > This turned out to be a bug in our beta code, revamped to support I/O > completion ports and the code for undotting of the leading dot (per > RFC5321 4.5.2) fell thru the crack. So we can nix this one. :)
Yet, it wouldn't have hurt if those signatures had passed. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
