On 6/27/2011 10:51 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> We should have the DKIM signing specification normatively require >>> checking for every known technique, since we cannot be sure that any >>> other part of the system will perform the necessary checks. >> >> +100 >> >> But sadly the consensus of this WG was otherwise :-( > > Mmm, I think Dave was being sarcastic.
Dave thinks so, too. Dave even thought that was pretty obvious, but Dave should have known better. The term for the class of exercise I described is "boiling the ocean"... Alternatively is requires already knowing what is not known. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
