> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:13 AM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] spam filtering 101 > > +1, revising RFC 2505, whose date is in last century, should be due.
Actually I suspect this might be a different document, since the claimed attack isn't necessarily specific to spam. Such a new document might make a lot of references to RFC2505. On the other hand, if RFC2505bis was geared (and re-titled) toward more general abuse prevention, it would make more sense. In any case, it seems unlikely this group will re-charter to do that, so someone could take it up as an independent submission or bring it to the APPSAWG or something like that. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
