On Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:47:52 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org > > [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:44 AM > > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Final update to 4871bis for working group review > > > > I agree it's not exactly what is specified in the protocol, but this is > > an implementation design issue. I think it's safe. If the DKIM > > protocol says I can't do something like this, then I think we have a > > problem with the current "describe it and let implementors deal with it" > > plan. > > It's definitely not proscribed by DKIM. All I meant was that you're > preventing a signer from deliberately accepting responsibility for a > message thus modified (by doing only one "from" in "h="), knowing the > risks of doing so.
Yes. I can live with that. Thanks, Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
