On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Richard Dawe <rich.d...@messagesystems.com>wrote:
> > Do you think that DMARC provides a better way of testing your DKIM > signatures than DKIM's t=y? E.g.: "p=none" DMARC policy. > > > I don't understand what you're after here. How would a mail receiver apply "p=none" as different from handling a bad signature? In both cases, delivery is supposed to be unaffected. -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
