On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> Here are two small tweaks that might correct things: > > y This domain is testing DKIM. Verifiers MUST NOT treat messages > from Signers in testing mode differently from unsigned email. > This covers both successful and failed verification. > Verifiers MAY wish to track and report testing mode results to > assist the Signer. > > This isn't quite right, I think. For a signed message that verifies, a negative reputation should still be considered applicable. A positive one should not. That's not equivalent to unsigned. -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
