On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Michael Deutschmann < mich...@talamasca.ocis.net> wrote:
> (I have deployed DKIM alone senderside, but that's just to keep in > practice in case someone invents an accessory protocol that's actually > sane. Allowing me to declare that all mail bearing my RFC821 MAIL FROM: > without a corresponding signature is bogus while saying nothing about > that which merely bears my RFC822 From: would be a good start.) > > If that's the magic you seek, I propose writing it up as an I-D and doing some practical interoperability experiments, and see if it takes off. It's easy to lob "you should've done it this way" grenades without actually putting any energy behind it other than a critical missive here and there. -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
