On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:05 PM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> > So far this exercise has mostly served to persuade me that putting > envelope info in the DKIM signature is a bad idea, and our advice to people > who have problems with recipients remailing spam they've signed remains > "don't do that." > > I agree, and I'm certainly fine with saying that more forcefully than the text that's currently there. -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html