On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:05 PM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:

>
> So far this exercise has mostly served to persuade me that putting
> envelope info in the DKIM signature is a bad idea, and our advice to people
> who have problems with recipients remailing spam they've signed remains
> "don't do that."
>
>
I agree, and I'm certainly fine with saying that more forcefully than the
text that's currently there.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to