ietf-smtp  

Messages by Date

• 2008/05/22 Mailing Lists v. BATV John Leslie
• 2008/05/22 Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV Peter J. Holzer
• 2008/05/22 Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/22 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/21 Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/21 Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis? mouss
• 2008/05/21 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/21 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Philip Guenther
• 2008/05/21 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/05/21 Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/21 Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Philip Guenther
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call John R Levine
• 2008/05/20 Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis? John R Levine
• 2008/05/20 Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: remote signing Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Philip Guenther
• 2008/05/20 Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call John R Levine
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? John Levine
• 2008/05/20 Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? John Levine
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Tony Finch
• 2008/05/20 Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call John Levine
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Tony Hansen
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? John Leslie
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Tony Finch
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Tony Finch
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Tony Finch
• 2008/05/20 BATV smtp extension Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Paul Smith
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call mouss
• 2008/05/20 Re: SMTP metadata transfer Paul Smith
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Paul Smith
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call SM
• 2008/05/20 Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV Paul Smith
• 2008/05/20 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Paul Smith
• 2008/05/20 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Paul Smith
• 2008/05/20 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/19 Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2008/05/19 Lose the time stamp in BATV John R Levine
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Tony Hansen
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John Levine
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/19 Re: private key BATV is useful John R Levine
• 2008/05/19 Re: private key BATV is useful mouss
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/19 smarthosts Tony Finch
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/19 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV doesn't fix forwarding Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Hector Santos
• 2008/05/19 Re: SMTP metadata transfer Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/05/19 Re: SMTP metadata transfer Tony Finch
• 2008/05/19 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Paul Smith
• 2008/05/19 Re: SMTP metadata transfer Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/05/19 Re: private key BATV is useful Paul Smith
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Tony Finch
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Jeff Macdonald
• 2008/05/19 Re: SMTP metadata transfer Tony Finch
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John Levine
• 2008/05/19 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Tony Hansen
• 2008/05/19 Re: private key BATV is useful John R Levine
• 2008/05/19 SMTP metadata transfer Paul Smith
• 2008/05/19 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Paul Smith
• 2008/05/19 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/19 Re: public key BATV isn't useful Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/18 Re: public key BATV isn't useful John Levine
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language John C Klensin
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language John C Klensin
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John Levine
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language Tony Hansen
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language SM
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Steve Atkins
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call mouss
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John Levine
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/18 Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language Bill McQuillan
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call SM
• 2008/05/18 Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/18 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Peter J. Holzer
• 2008/05/17 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/17 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John R Levine
• 2008/05/17 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/17 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John R Levine
• 2008/05/17 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/17 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call John Levine
• 2008/05/17 RE: BATV pseudo-Last Call Dan Wing
• 2008/05/16 BATV pseudo-Last Call Dave Crocker
• 2008/05/15 Preferred Originator Santoshkumar K S
• 2008/05/14 Re: Additional parameters to SMTP commands Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/05/14 Re: Additional parameters to SMTP commands John C Klensin
• 2008/05/14 Additional parameters to SMTP commands Santoshkumar K S
• 2008/05/08 Re: MX lookup error handling change Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/05/08 Re: MX lookup error handling change Tony Finch
• 2008/05/08 Re: MX lookup error handling change SM
• 2008/05/08 Re: MX lookup error handling change Tony Finch
• 2008/05/08 Re: MX lookup error handling change Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/05/08 Re: MX lookup error handling change Hector Santos
• 2008/05/08 MX lookup error handling change Tony Finch
• 2008/05/08 Forwarding in SMTP Santoshkumar K S
• 2008/05/06 Re: SPF instead of MX? was:Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Hector Santos
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Hector Santos
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/05/05 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/04 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/05/03 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/05/03 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? John Leslie
• 2008/05/02 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/05/02 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/02 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Hector Santos
• 2008/04/30 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Frank Ellermann
• 2008/04/30 Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? John Leslie
• 2008/04/30 Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail? Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2008/04/26 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Frank Ellermann
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Douglas Otis
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Frank Ellermann
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Peter J. Holzer
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Paul Smith
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Paul Smith
• 2008/04/25 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/04/24 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/24 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/04/24 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Peter J. Holzer
• 2008/04/24 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/04/23 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/04/21 Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue Hector Santos
• 2008/04/21 Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue Keith Moore
• 2008/04/21 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2008/04/21 Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue Alex van den Bogaerdt
• 2008/04/19 IPv6 considerations (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/04/19 Interesting Thread regarding unexpected MX lookups. Hector Santos
• 2008/04/19 Sheep look up (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/04/19 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/18 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Willie Gillespie
• 2008/04/18 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Douglas Otis
• 2008/04/18 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/18 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/18 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/04/18 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Paul Smith
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Hector Santos
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt SM
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt John Leslie
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue Hector Santos
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
• 2008/04/17 Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts Hector Santos
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
• 2008/04/17 Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Keith Moore
• 2008/04/17 Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts John C Klensin
• 2008/04/17 Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts (was: Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt) John Leslie
• 2008/04/17 Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue Dave Crocker
• 2008/04/17 Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt Tony Finch
• 2008/04/17 Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts Hector Santos

• Earlier messages
• Later messages