On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 8/9/2010 5:25 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: >>> Can folks offer pointers to normative language? >> >> Tail end of section 6.1 of 5321: >> >> "To avoid receiving duplicate messages as the result of timeouts, a >> receiver-SMTP MUST seek to minimize the time required to respond to >> the final<CRLF>.<CRLF> end of data indicator. " >> >> However the same section also says: > > Thanks! > > And, yeah, it might be worth reviewing both normative directives.
+1
