--On Tuesday, August 10, 2010 09:48 -0700 Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > As I recall, delivermail didn't do queuing. So, yes, the > delivery attempt was immediate. > > Sendmail behaved the same way, for a first attempt, and did > queuing only if that attempt failed. > > MMDF always did queuing first, spawning a delivery attempt > afterward. (Submission and delivery were independent Unix > processes.) And IIR, several of the small computer-based things, including PC/TCP, would make a direct attempt to deliver and send mail to what we would now call a submission server only if that single direct delivery attempt failed. john
- Re: per user post-data rejects, ... John Levine
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA J.D. Falk
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA John C Klensin
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Tony Finch
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Tony Finch
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Steve Atkins
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Tony Finch
- Re: mail proxies, Processing aft... John Levine
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Dave CROCKER
- Re: Processing after the end of ... Hector Santos
