> Not every user requires this kind of bandwidth today, but the > applications to generate sch data are here (sound, multiple still > images, video, sharing executables, etc). You can't unring the bell, so > it's probably worthwhile to study what can be done to mitigate the > impact. of course this is precisely why the SMTP SIZE extension was developed in the first place. and when the rescap group finishes its work it will be a trivial matter to use rescap to advertise a per-recipient max-message-size attribute.
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? John W. Noerenberg
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? John C Klensin
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Dick St.Peters
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Peter Deutsch
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How large is too ... Dick St.Peters
- Re: Email messages: How large is ... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Keith Moore
- RFC 2225 Getty Verma
- Re: Email messages: How large is ... David Mitton
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Keith Moore
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Fred Marshall
- Re: Email messages: How large is too ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Jacob Palme
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Dick St.Peters
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Matt Crawford
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Scot McPherson
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Martin Djernaes
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Jon Crowcroft