[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there sufficient interest to create a working group to overhaul RFC1440 > into something more usable in today's Internet? It might not take much work--this might actually be a case where HTTP is appropriate, since you're sending the same sorts of entities that might otherwise be downloaded from HTTP servers. If so, it might suffice to standardize on an HTTP method and, ideally, define a way to get the right URL given an email address. -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.| |Chief Scientist |=============================================| |eCal Corp. |"HTTP is what happens in the absence of good | |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|design." -- Keith Moore | \==============================================================/
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? greg . guldenschuh
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Michael Welzl
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? size ... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Michael H. Warfield
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Danny Iacovou
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Kent Crispin
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Peter Deutsch
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Email messages: How large is too ... John Stracke
- Re: Email messages: How large is... Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Kent Crispin
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Peter Deutsch
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Dave Crocker
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Peter Deutsch
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Dave Crocker
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Peter Deutsch
- The Difficulty with Patents ... Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How larg... Perry E. Metzger