Joel Jaeggli wrote: > in any event mailing lists traffice should not generate such a response. Anybody from the Exchange team listening? Nearly all the offenders are using Exchange. It doesn't make MS look good. :-) -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.| |Chief Scientist |=============================================| |eCal Corp. |"I think we'd get fewer bug reports if we | |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|stopped selling our software off planet." | \==============================================================/
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Randy Bush
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Stracke
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Scott Brim
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Steve Conner
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Joel Jaeggli
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Patrik Fältström
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Sean Doran
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Tripp Lilley
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Joel Jaeggli
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Stracke
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Michael Richardson
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Vernon Schryver
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Ted Gavin
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Stracke
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Martin
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Ted Gavin
- RE: guidance (re: social event politeness) Book, Robert