> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > you're ideologically opposed to deploying v6 instead of against it for > technical reasons? Ah, *that's* what's wrong with IPv6 - it doesn't pay enough attention to control of the means of production by the workers. And here I was, all these years, thinking there were all these technical things wrong with IPv6. Oh well, I guess I wasn't very perceptive. Noel
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Chris Millikin
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! David Higginbotham
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Chris Millikin
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kevin Farley
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Bradner
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael Richardson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Paul Ferguson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Geoff Huston
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Bradley Dunn
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft