At 03:05 PM 1/31/2001 -0800, Ed Gerck wrote: >You miss at least one other possibility. If it is possible to develop >an addressing scheme that works in a heterogeneous network, then >we can have point-to-point functionality across system borders and >do not require a homogeneous address space to do so. There is roughly 30 years of experience in this realm that suggests otherwise. The difference between theory and practise is practise. If you wish to formulate a detailed technical specification, and subject it to community review and testing, perhaps you will indeed show show us an approach that will work. Until then, your suggestion is just an untested theory. d/
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Christian Huitema
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Bill Manning
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Bill Manning
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Fleischman, Eric W
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David T. Perkins
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Ed Gerck
- head hurting [was Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverabl... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Dave Crocker
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael Richardson
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Hilarie Orman
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael W. Condry
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore