Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

[Michael W. Condry]

Well the message I got earlier was the IPv6 will not fix
the NAT problem - true or not true?  I assume
with IPv6 there is no need for NATs. Who thinks
they will still be around - humm maybe if the ISP charge
a fortune for 4 IP addresses vs 1 IP address (IPv6 or IPv4).

At 11:53 AM 2/2/2001 -0800, Greg Minshall wrote:
>Keith,
>
> > perhaps.  but I note that for many of the examples you quoted, "dealing
> > with them" was not nearly as nice as "not having to deal with them".
>
>absolutely.  i was very happy when we moved from the previous world to the
>(more or less pure) IP world.
>
>i will be very happy when we move from the NAT world to the (more or less
>pure) IPv6 world.
>
>Greg (who wrote email gateways in a past life)

Michael W. Condry
Director, Network Edge Technology