Keith, > perhaps. but I note that for many of the examples you quoted, "dealing > with them" was not nearly as nice as "not having to deal with them". absolutely. i was very happy when we moved from the previous world to the (more or less pure) IP world. i will be very happy when we move from the NAT world to the (more or less pure) IPv6 world. Greg (who wrote email gateways in a past life)
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Ed Gerck
- head hurting [was Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverabl... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Dave Crocker
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael Richardson
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Hilarie Orman
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael W. Condry
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Eliot Lear
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables V Guruprasad