Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine]

David,

> IPv6 does not solve the need to renumber if you change providers (and no, 
> not everyone can be a provider -- IPv6 uses CIDR, just like IPv4).  Until 
> that issue is addressed, there will be NATs.  Even for v6.

Odd. Every time I renumbered some site (hq.af.mil and sundry other sites
sharing similar characteristics), there was neither a NAT prior to, nor
subsequent to, the renumbering.

I suggest that renumbering pre-existed, and did not motivate, NATtage of
the NET.

Eric