Dave, > Technogeeks, perhaps. The vast majority of people on the Internet who are > behind NATs most likely don't even know it. With all the discussion of Napster and so-called "peer to peer" networking, I think NATs are going to become far more visible to users as these applications grow in popularity. Today, you can use something like Gnutella if at least one party is not behind a NAT.
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Hilarie Orman
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliver... V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Greg Minshall
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Michael W. Condry
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliver... Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Eliot Lear
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliver... V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/del... V Guruprasad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliver... David R. Conrad
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables John Kristoff
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliver... Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Melinda Shore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Randy Bush