leo vegoda wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:30:50AM -0500, in message <2224339706.985771850@P2>, John
>C Klensin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Re: RE: Deja Vu
>
> > there to meet in a nice place where many of the attendees would
> > come and not participate. While it would presumably be
> > convenient for you, I'm actually worried a bit about London in
> > that regard.
>
> London's sort of OK - but's it's hardly party city.
Actually, I see what John means; for many Americans, London is pretty much an ideal
foreign vacation. A modern city, with beautiful
historical sites, great museums, and no language barrier. If you're trying to be
sneaky and hide your vacation in a business trip, you
don't have to go far, or make a great effort, to fit in some tourism in the
interstices between meetings.
--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp. |Illiterate? Write today for free help! |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |
\==============================================================/
