Thank you!

FWIW, the ietf-announce list had 4717 subscribers (some of which are 
sublists, news gateways and the like) - so any category where you get more 
than 400 subscribers is probably proof positive that a "market" exists for 
a special list for that category.

Looking forward to seeing what happens...

                      Harald


--On tirsdag, november 20, 2001 15:39:05 +0100 Bruce Campbell 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
>> I *think* the matter of making 2 lists (or 3, or 4, or...) can be done in
>> about 1 hour using Procmail and Mailman on an Unix box: subscribe once to
>> the ietf-announce list, let procmail feed into a set of mailman aliases.
>> Go.
>
> Ok.  I am going to do this on my personal machine (not connected with my
> employer).  The splits that I am proposing to use are those listed at
> http://www.ietf.org/maillist.html, being:
>
>       ietf-announce-meeting:  IETF Meeting logistics,
>       ietf-announce-agendas:  Agendas for working group and BOF sessions at
> IETF meetings,        ietf-announce-wgact:    working group actions,
>       ietf-announce-idann:    Internet-Draft announcements,
>       ietf-announce-iesglast: IESG Last Calls,
>       ietf-announce-iesgact:  IESG protocol and document actions,
>       ietf-announce-rfc:      RFC announcements.
>       ietf-announce-default:  Anything not matched.
>
> The above splits are perhaps, overkill, however they consist of the
> 'known' categories.  Note that I am going err on the side of caution, and
> assume that all subscribers to any of the above would wish to know about
> announcements that do not fit into a known category (via the -default
> split above).
>
>> Anyone who wants to put up?
>
> Subscription information should be available tomorrow or later tonight,
> depending on my available spare time, or whether anyone else bothers to do
> this beforehand.  The procmail recipe used to implement such will also be
> available.
>
> Regards,
>
> - --
>                              Bruce Campbell
> RIPE
> NCC              I do not speak for my employer
> Operations
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7+msQ5GBMOVYsixsRAlC8AJ494PfapD8XBSYCTnExKLM6+iX+ywCdESfA
> 2YpNl8MLxS2IFzqIsxxT4x0=
> =hj+p
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


Reply via email to