Margaret Wasserman wrote: > There have been people calling for the complete removal of > site-local addressing all along. > > And, elimination/deprecation was quite clearly raised as an > option in Atlanta. At that time, we called for opinions on > the following > options: elimination, "limited", "moderate" or "full" usage, > and each of the four options had some support in that WG meeting.
And in Atlanta we all agreed to take elimination off the list, and it has not been discussed since. The agenda for SF was: Site-Local Addressing Impact of site-local addressing -- Margaret Wasserman (20 min) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wasserman-ipv6-sl-impact-02.tx t "Limited Usage" Summary -- Margaret Wasserman (5 min) [See appendix of draft-wasserman-ipv6-sl-impact-02, above.] "Moderate Usage" Proposal -- Bob Hinden (15 min) http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hinden-ipv6-sl-moderate-01.txt Nowhere in that or the mail preceding the meeting is elimination mentioned. Tony
