Hi Itojun,
How would you write documents which warn against people doing funny
things? I wrote a draft about the issues with hop-by-hop options in IPv6
and cautioning against their use. I see that there are still proposals
coming out which depend on new hbh options? What should I do instead of
writing a draft?
Cheers
Suresh
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
Charging for IDs will kill innovation. I use IDs to float ideas which
may or may not bear fruition. I would not work on these if I had to pay.
I also work on things at the IETF than my employer does not sponsor.
These things will get thrown out as well.
I assume i-d to be a proposal for a new protocol, which is
implementable with a reasonable efforts and costs. i think your
view and my view are opposite.
i'd like to see the following:
- submission of i-d requires an implementation
- to become a RFC requires two independent interoperable implementation
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
