I doubt that this is a huge tool-builder issue. Lets not go looking for problems.
I think moving the boilerplate is a good idea, particularly for people who are still reading the TXT versions of the docs. The only piece I would keep on the front page is the bit that says where comments should go. -----Original Message----- From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of Andrew Sullivan Sent: Wed 3/4/2009 10:55 AM To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Abstract on Page 1? On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:50:19PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > "The following text must be included on the first page of each IETF > Document as specified below:" Some of us may regard the requirement of standard legal boilerplate taking precedence over technical content to be a symptom of a problem, rather than something to be accepted quietly. (But I have a great deal of sympathy for the toolbuilders, and think that maybe just now is not a good time to be making more changes. Perhaps the next time one is required anyway, though?) A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
