On Nov 14, 2010, at 10:06 AM, SM wrote: > At 04:03 12-11-10, Shane Kerr wrote: >> It is sometimes possible to create systems to meet the needs of privacy >> and oversight - for example a closed review board - but I think just >> publishing a list of who gets free access to each IETF is probably good >> a good idea. > > There is already an IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (see BCP > 101). Approximately 2% of attendees received complementary tickets
How many of those are volunteers/host/NOC/future host, and how many are "discretionary comp"? Does the IAOC have access to the actual list of names? If so, I think that's good enough, because the corruption that we're trying to solve would require collaboration between the IETF chair and the IAOC. I would say that the risk is low enough that privacy trumps transparency. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
