On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 10:06 AM, SM wrote: > >> At 04:03 12-11-10, Shane Kerr wrote: >>> It is sometimes possible to create systems to meet the needs of privacy >>> and oversight - for example a closed review board - but I think just >>> publishing a list of who gets free access to each IETF is probably good >>> a good idea. >> >> There is already an IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (see BCP >> 101). Approximately 2% of attendees received complementary tickets > > How many of those are volunteers/host/NOC/future host, and how many are > "discretionary comp"?
There was exactly 1 "discretionary" in Beijing. Wearing no hats, and just my own personal opinion, this seems like making a mountain out of a molehill to me. Regards Marshall > > Does the IAOC have access to the actual list of names? If so, I think that's > good enough, because the corruption that we're trying to solve would require > collaboration between the IETF chair and the IAOC. I would say that the risk > is low enough that privacy trumps transparency. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
