On Jul 2, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > I saw the same thing. It is a shame that work that directly removes barriers > to REAL ipv6 deployment gets shouted down by a few people not involved in > REAL ipv6 deployment >
I find myself wondering what you mean by REAL IPv6. For me, REAL IPv6 is code that uses the IPv6 programming model, 128 bit addresses, end-to-end transparency, no NATs. 6to4 certainly qualifies. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
