Hi Michael, +1 for the deadline - 1 for the unified slide deck: from my experience with Meetecho, this is not always a good idea, both because of the deck's dimensions and of the difficulties in automatically recognizing speakers' switches (e.g. for the recordings of the single presentations).
My 2 cents, Simon Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> ha scritto: > >>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Narten <nar...@us.ibm.com> writes: > Thomas> IMO, what is missing is operational Best Practices. We seem > Thomas> to be lacking them (are any written down?) And we don't > Thomas> follow them consistently, especially from one WG to > Thomas> another. Many of the problems I see with remote > Thomas> participation facilties have to do not with the technology > Thomas> per se, but with lack of proper training and advance > Thomas> testing. I get the general sense that getting the remote > >+5. > >I am setting a deadline for slides for IETF86 for my WG, and I will be >doing a unified slide deck. I might allow text on a slide to be >updated the day before... but no slides, no speak. > > >-- >Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
