On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 09/01/2010 10:05 AM, gajendra khanna wrote: > >> Hi >> >>> Me Lord, Point to be noted, I object, >>> This is where the problem exist. You tells , You explained., Wiki >>> explains, >>> 100 blogs explains, Google search explains... >>> Why cannot you think in a simplistic way... where User can explain to >>> himself. If you ask the best way THE USER like then I would say >>> Users must be asked for Drop drown menu (to select, facebook, googlechat, >>> yahoo etc) >>> Then Username/email and password nothing else. Software is meant to keep >>> complexity. Think like meebo.. Any Interface which ask other then these >>> things is "very very very bad" >>> If we can customize Linux in the way USER want and USER like then we can >>> win >>> the game. >>> >>> >>> >>>> other non-geeky very new users who just migrated from windows the same >>>> thing and they were able to configure it successfully in the first >>>> attempt. >>>> >>> >> XMPP compliance is a new introduction to facebook chat. >> Pidgin should gradually introduce Facebook as an option. Similar was >> the case with gtalk as well. Initially it was configured with xmpp and >> now gtalk appears as an option in new versions of pidgin. >> G >> >> > File a bug report in their list. :-) > > @Narendra, you ignored the rest part of my second paragraph lol. > I told you, with the same explanation they were able to configure it in the > first attempt. I commented on these two lines itself. perhaps you are not trying to listen me or taking it offensive. I am making a general example. This is what the problem is Linux and you. My question was this. If you were not there for explaining the configuration , will they be able to do it themself. How much time they would have needed to apply the settings. Compare this with any window based facebook software. -- l...@iitd - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm
