>> this is much better post wise and content wise , the point is we are not >> talking about this group the op has asked for something more deep with org >> structure , what is there in a name every one has a freedom to give a name >> to whatever they want . > > It was just a suggestion.. I will defiantly follow this convention.. and I > will try to create Good number of "Open Technology User Group" > If others are feeling good... that is a good sign.. > PS: I am not talking about restructuring lug-iitd .. >> >> untill and unless they get along and work it does not matter in the name i >> suppose . Since your work will create the identity as a collective and yes >> that is the good point of being in the community i feel. >> >> -Satya > > -- > LUG@IITD - http://lug-iitd.org/Footer >
Yes, my response was to the idea of creating subsequent groups (not renaming this group) with this broader coverage of open source applications. Of course whether that will camouflage the importance of Linux given the impression people already have about LUG groups is debatable. And both groups can always co-exist with their respective mandates. Regards, Sanat -- LUG@IITD - http://lug-iitd.org/Footer
