On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:18 PM, satyaakam goswami <[email protected]>wrote:
> Yes, my response was to the idea of creating subsequent groups (not >> renaming this group) with this broader coverage of open source applications. >> Of course whether that will camouflage the importance of Linux given the >> impression people already have about LUG groups is debatable. And both >> groups can always co-exist with their respective mandates. >> > > again you are bottom posting :-( , > Bottom Posting is not bad.. people now a day stopped mailing to the group because of the the counter-arguments.. -- LUG@IITD - http://lug-iitd.org/Footer
