Expanding ............................................................
running stats for macro expansion:
61 collections
6178 ms elapsed cpu time, including 566 ms collecting
6855 ms elapsed real time, including 665 ms collecting
514559168 bytes allocated
Compiling
.................................................................................
running stats for code generation and serialization:
144 collections
15937 ms elapsed cpu time, including 3646 ms collecting
17827 ms elapsed real time, including 4012 ms collecting
1205929968 bytes allocated
running stats for the entire bootstrap process:
205 collections
22120 ms elapsed cpu time, including 4212 ms collecting
24723 ms elapsed real time, including 4677 ms collecting
1720548848 bytes allocated
so this machine is slower... but not as slow as the glut time
suggested, I don't think.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Ramana Kumar wrote:
>
>> Is there a non gl/glut related benchmark for expansion/compilation I
>> should try to see whether it's a problem with those libraries or I
>> just have a slow 64-bit machine? (It's Athlon 2800+ with 1GB RAM.)
>
> How long does it take to bootstrap Ikarus on your machine? On my
> machine, in 64-bit, I get:
>
> Expanding ............................................................
> running stats for macro expansion:
> 61 collections
> 3780 ms elapsed cpu time, including 361 ms collecting
> 5523 ms elapsed real time, including 362 ms collecting
> 515983184 bytes allocated
> Compiling
> .................................................................................
> running stats for code generation and serialization:
> 143 collections
> 7946 ms elapsed cpu time, including 2121 ms collecting
> 8813 ms elapsed real time, including 2133 ms collecting
> 1204933440 bytes allocated
> running stats for the entire bootstrap process:
> 204 collections
> 11728 ms elapsed cpu time, including 2483 ms collecting
> 14338 ms elapsed real time, including 2495 ms collecting
> 1720976304 bytes allocated
>
> What do you get? Also, there is, IIRC, a compile-all script
> in the xitomatl collection that you can use to compile all
> these libraries and see how long it takes.
>
> Aziz,,,
>
