I see the intended audience for the adventures is not people willing to learn Scheme, but to learn how to implement it. ;)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[email protected]> wrote: > Two errors. :-) > > 1. Ypsilon's expander is not based on psyntax. > > 2. The statement "but it is not possible to instantiate modules at runtime > only or at expand time only" is false. You can definitely instantiate a > module for one phase and not another in Ikarus and the other psyntax-based > implementations. This is one of the important design decisions in designing > the system. It is like what you say for Larceny, except that it does not > depend on the "for" declaration. I leave it up to you to verify. > > Aziz,,, > > > On Apr 27, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Michele Simionato wrote: > >> http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/scheme/scheme21.html >> >> This is a political episode and I realize I have been harsh with the >> R6RS editors, >> but I cannot help feel this way about the whole story of phase >> separation/multiple instantiation. > >
