FWIW I would never use --load... I find it so much cleaner conceptually to work with immutable environments (e.g. by using scheme-script). Is this an uncommon opinion?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Ramana Kumar wrote: > >>> it means, they're evaluated as if they're typed at the repl. >> >> so in the (ikarus) environment? > > In the environment obtained by calling (interaction-environment), > which initially has the same bindings as the environment obtained > by (environment '(ikarus)). The first is a mutable environment > that eval extends when it sees definitions. The second is immutable > and eval can only eval expressions in it. > > Aziz,,, >
