On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:42 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > Derick Eddington <[email protected]> writes:
> > Gitorious looks okay except for bug reporting. I think it's not okay to > > require people to edit a wiki to report bugs, because that would piss me > > off and we'll get inconsistently formed/organized stuff we'll go crazy > > trying to keep track of. > > > I agree. What I've done for dorodango is hosting the code on gitorious, > and applying for a project at Gna! <http://www.gna.org> to get a bug > tracker. We could consider a similiar approach for the "ported" project. Gna! seems like they only accept GPL stuff [1], but many of the ported libraries are not GPL and I think our private-facility libraries should be MIT-style. Plus, I'd like outsiders to be able to subscribe to issues and be able to comment on them, but I don't know if Gna! or other non-LaunchPad hosts support that. I'd prefer the issue tracker be integrated with the repository hosting, but given the minimal size of the Ported project, I can probably live with it not being so. [1] http://about.gna.org/ > > After looking more at Git, I think it is cooler than Bazaar. > > > Nice to hear this! However, my thoughts are: if Bazaar is adequate, LaunchPad is very attractive. For the Ported project, I think a full suite of integrated capabilities is more important than the single aspect of which DVCS. -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
