Marco Maggi <[email protected]> writes: > "Andreas Rottmann" wrote: >> and hence propose a policy of not using version numbers in >> libraries, as they are not portable -- opinions? > > Sheesh, I am the only one desiring version numbers... > The way I see it, version numbers don't make much sense for individual libraries, unless those are really stand-alone. If you have a bunch of libraries developed in a VCS (or released as a tarball), they should be internally in sync.
So I don't want to depend on a (set of) specific version of a single library, but on the whole tarball. But that's only my personal current stance on this topic -- I'm not wanting to forbid code in wak using version numbers, if the people involved in maintaining that code want to have them. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
