Göran Weinholt <[email protected]> writes: > Marco Maggi <[email protected]> writes: > >> "Andreas Rottmann" wrote: >>> Also, I'd like to support PLT/Racket with the Wak packages, >> >> "Racket"? Was it not a 1st April joke? Or is *this* the >> actual joke? :) >> >>> and hence propose a policy of not using version numbers in >>> libraries, as they are not portable -- opinions? >> >> Sheesh, I am the only one desiring version numbers... > > No, I also want to have version numbers. > > I don't quite understand why version numbers aren't portable (wrt. PLT). > Last time I tried PLT with my libraries, I was able to use `plt-r6rs > --install' to install my versioned libraries (that don't have version > numbers in their file names). After that things seemed to work fine. > OK, I was referring to the fact that if you don't use "plt-r6rs --install", PLT won't find libraries that don't have their versions encoded in the filenames. I wasn't aware plt-r6rs --install deals with this; thanks for pointing this out.
Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
