2009/3/23 <Zhenghui.Xie at sun.com>: > Attached is a writeup based on our discussion of the SCF part. Comments? > Send them out by COB Weds, or silence is gold afterward :-) > > Thanks. > > -Jan > > > 1. ilb will have one single instance in SMF framework: > svc:/network/loadbalancer/ilb:default > 2. persistent configuration of ilb is saved in SCF.
Why SCF? I wouldn't regard SCF as suitable for holding complex configuration data of the type required for something like ilb. > 7. user can use svcprop(1) to get ilb configuration. But should NOT use > svccfg(1M) to change ilb configuration. Why not? If you're using SCF, then svccfg should be a supported way of modifying the configuration - ilbadm is merely a convenience. Which is another reason to wonder whether SCF is suitable. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
