On 03/24/09 13:57, Peter Tribble wrote: > 2009/3/23 <Zhenghui.Xie at sun.com>: >> Attached is a writeup based on our discussion of the SCF part. Comments? >> Send them out by COB Weds, or silence is gold afterward :-) >> >> Thanks. >> >> -Jan >> >> >> 1. ilb will have one single instance in SMF framework: >> svc:/network/loadbalancer/ilb:default >> 2. persistent configuration of ilb is saved in SCF. > > Why SCF? I wouldn't regard SCF as suitable for holding complex configuration > data of the type required for something like ilb.
how complex are you thinking? >> 7. user can use svcprop(1) to get ilb configuration. But should NOT use >> svccfg(1M) to change ilb configuration. > > Why not? If you're using SCF, then svccfg should be a supported way of > modifying the configuration why? just because you *can* edit many files with vi doesn't mean that's a supported way of doing it. Michael -- Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
