On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 17:57 +0530, Raja Subramanian wrote: > More than the speed advantage, the point of discussion was > that Google/public DNS will confuse CDN, while ISP DNS > would not cause issues. A caching name server will work > best for both speed and CDN.
Ah, I see. I should have noticed that. My bad. -- Roshan George _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
