Hello, I'm sorry that I didn't elaborate on my question. I had installed Ubuntu on a client system of the net center which I frequently visit. As I was permittted to do so on only one such system. The server admin system used a cafe software which wasn't available for Linux. So I was looking for a cross-platfoem Cafe Software and put the question to the mailing list
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Asokan Pichai <paso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 July 2011 14:47, Prabhu Gnana Sundar <prabh...@ymail.com> wrote: > > > >>> Can any of you suggest an Internet cafe software to run on Ubuntu > >>> client and > >>> Windows server? > > > >> no > > > > Hi Kenneth, > > The way you have responded above to Anu Nivas's post is just > *ridiculous* and *without* any point or explanation which is not going to > help anyone here. It would be good if you give proper answers rather than > *just* replies. Only responses with points and good suggestions would help > us learn from the list. These do *not* help us in anyway. > > > > This is not the first time you are pointed out with *pointless* replies > like this, but you still keep doing it. Not sure if you understand the > purpose of the list. > > > > I can see others responding in a much better way, which helps us to learn > from them. > > > > I see a lot of criticism of KG's response; I am not happy about > someone expecting to get an answer from the LUG about > proprietary software. And I am not sure that the list should encourage > people to answer such questions. > > And KG's succinct (ok, cryptic) answer was to the point. I might have > told the OP politely not to expect such > questions answered here; or I might have done it rudely. > > I am concerned that a large number of list members are looking up to > the LUG list as a general trouble-shooting > help desk. I for one would be very unhappy if that is the direction it > turns to. > > The LUG and the list are meant to foster a sense of community learning > and working together for FOSS > software. > > I am considerably more offended by the question asked (and the > defenses for the same) than the > manner of KG's answer. > -- > Asokan Pichai > *-------------------* > We will find a way. Or, make one. (Hannibal) > _______________________________________________ > ILUGC Mailing List: > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
