Mohan Sundaram <mohan....@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:55 PM, A. Mani <a.mani....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Further the member(s) in question should inform the list well in advance >> and obtain an implicit no objection certificate on the mailing list. > > Such thoughts in the context of what Baskar is doing boil down to > being regimental and bordering on the ludicrous. > >>> b.If we talk about ILUGC in the event or had banner/any other material >>> promoting ILUGC. >>> >>> In all other events it better to post to the list without 'on behalf ILUGC'. >>> >> >> But ILUGC may be involved in Free software events subject to clearance >> from the mailing list. > > I think we have lost complete sight of the spirit and the symbiotic > relationship ILUGC can have with companies like Baskar's in furthering > the cause of FOSS. No wonder Baskar feels he is better off without > involving ILUGC. > > This does not bode well for us as a group. We are not a formal group > (formal groups will have a structure, representatation vide elected > office bearers etc) to give clearances nor do we have any one vested > with that authority in this group. >
I completely agree with you here. Thanks and Regards Noorul _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines: http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines
