-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 you are wrong. pine has excellent GPG integration using thirdparty (GPL) plugin. didn't you read my mail thoroughly ? It itself is GPG signed. I use pgp4pine for it. There are other plugins for it too. Either log onto http://pgp4pine.flatline.de or if you're using Debian, just hit: apt-get install pgp4pine;
Yes, you're right regarding Mutt. For an average user it is hell to configure and understand. I don't understand how people call it to be better than pine (besides licensing issues). rrs On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:46:24 -0500 (CDT) Rishabh Manocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > definitely...pine is the best mail program out there.Period. > Mutt is hell to configure(even understand) and the graphical mail readers > are even more worse. > The only problem with pine is that there is yet no GPG integration.As soon > as this becomes available(inherently) in pine...it will be the BEST mail > app ever...no matter what ts license says...;) > --Rishabh > > -- > Rishabh Manocha > http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/rmanocha > **********Your Quote for the day********** > The Englishman is a tippler, the Frenchman is a cur, the Dutchman is a peasant. > Saying > ****************************************** > > On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Yes, they aren't free softwares but they are the most killer ones on unixes. > > I was frustated on Debian machine, configuring mutt, until I hit thit simple > > command:-) > > apt-get source pine; > > > > rrs > > > > On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:36:09 +0530 > > Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [For the proud Pine and Pico users out there. ;) - Sandip] > > > > > > http://www.asty.org/articles/20010702pine.html > > > > > > When Non-Free is "Free Enough" > > > by Chris Allegretta > > > > > > The University of Washington's Pine mailer. A popular piece of software, > > > indeed, as is its editor component, Pico. So much so that most people > > > turn a blind eye to its license: a license, I feel, that is as bad as > > > anything that has ever come out of Redmond. > > > > > > Virtually every major GNU/Linux distribution ships binaries of Pine and > > > Pico with the notable exception of Debian. After all these programs are > > > veritable mainstays of the Unix world. Ironically, according to the > > > legal terms of the program, Debian may be the only distribution legally > > > allowed to distribute the program! > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Why do I feel this licenses is as bad as Microsoft's licenses? I don't, > > > I think it's worse. With any commercial license, you do not ever expect > > > to see or have rights over the source code to the software. In the case > > > of Pine, users are lulled into thinking they have rights to do what they > > > want with the software, but really they don't. And if UW makes the > > > license more proprietary or simply stops updating it, there's nothing > > > they can do about it. > > > > > > So, what can we do? For one thing, stop referring to Pine and Pico as > > > Open Source! And if you can't handle that (and you know who you are), at > > > least don't nominate them for awards specifically for Open Source > > > programs! Also do not lump Pine and Pico in with other GPL covered > > > programs on web pages or when discussing Free Software, as this may > > > confuse people into thinking that Pine and Pico are in fact also Free > > > Software programs, which they are not. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sandip Bhattacharya > > > sandip (at) puroga.com > > > Puroga Technologies Pvt. Ltd. > > > Work: http://www.puroga.com Home: http://www.sandipb.net > > > > > > GPG: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > > > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > > > > > - -- > > Ritesh Raj Sarraf > > RESEARCHUT (www.researchut.com) > > Happy GNU/Linux user since 1998 > > GPG Key ID: 0x04F130BC > > - ------ > > FORTUNE ! > > > > "Since it's a foregone conclusion that Microsoft will be littering its XML > > with pointers to Win32-based components, the best that can be said about > > its adoption of XML is that it will make it easier for browsers and > > applications on non-Windows platforms to understand which parts of the > > document it must ignore." > > -- Nicholas Petreley, "Computerworld", 3 September, 2001 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFAdGM/4Rhi6gTxMLwRAkprAKC0vcINaDFp2PzF1TLpYipnJr3JmQCgkArd > > 8azi5BaWp42el1g+GujcW+I= > > =BtBj > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT (www.researchut.com) Happy GNU/Linux user since 1998 GPG Key ID: 0x04F130BC - ------ FORTUNE ! When the government bureau's remedies don't match your problem, you modify the problem, not the remedy. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAdJRo4Rhi6gTxMLwRArb+AJ9xRYpJDmJx43MnF6RrMfd6RQ1GNgCfaIn5 lzLWUNudVjQH8KbLCibl+zg= =B4er -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
