-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:09:56PM +0530, Raj Mathur wrote:
[...] | Ah, I hadn't checked out that part of things and was under the | impression that load balancing won't work if you have a single | interface. If you can confirm that you can do this with both modems in | router mode I'll update the document accordingly, thanks. I'm running such configuration since past 8-9 months, with VSNL + Airtel :) It'll be a thread hijack, but can someone tell me if its okay for VSNL to let their Internet users, be able to connect their Datacenters on some RFC 1918 addresses. I mean from the perspective of security. I think they suck too. I found this last year, and this issue is still present here. I've posted the whole episode at http://wahjava.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/traceroute-1921681210/ . | | > BtW, did you ever get a chance to verify 'weight' assigned to | > networkroutes, hmm...? | | Nope, haven't tried that. Haven't even tried to download anything heavy | yet, just checked that it's possible. And anyideas, what'll be the logic. I think one needs a connection monitor like iptraf, and starts connect() to a large number of hosts in parallel, hmm...? TIA - -- Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ ·-- ·- ···· ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkGCjHy+EEHYuXnQRAlGDAKCBfaR/2w4pZfR1A+ubF9rms6ma8wCeI74c uc0RMyhv6rT/MnjWYoxf8SY= =RAR9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22/23, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
