How can I show / prove that the copy of email shown by some one is not tampered with when compared to original email?
Scenario - A sent an email to a B and D. B has tampered with the text of email and forwarded to C. C comes to D with a print copy of email from B. How can D show C that the original email by A and forwarded email by C are modified. D has shown C the original from A but C is not convinced and is casting aspersion on A and D of showing tampered emails. In similar scenario how does pgp signed mail proves the case except show genuineness of senders signatures? Sorry if this is something so simple that I am missing the obvious. -- Regards, Sudev Barar Read http://blog.sudev.in for topics ranging from here to there. PS: I know most of people do not follow email niceties (mostly they are not aware) but if you follow bottom post/in-line post style of email conversations it becomes a whole lot easier to carry on meaningful dialogue and you can snip out what is not meaningful too. Most people just hit reply button and top post leaving prior message appended uselessly at bottom. See if you can adopt this style and persuade others. In case you are already doing this ..... great, spread the message. _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
