On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday-ji 01 Oct-ji 2008, Swapnil-ji Bhartiya-ji wrote: > > [snip] > > Previous mail of Raj, Manoj ji, Karan Ji, then Sandeep > > I find it grossly unfair that neither Sandip nor I rate a ``ji'', > specially considering that I'm older that the other three (Manoj, KB > and Sandip) put together. I'll even settle for ``Raj bhaiyya'' if you > find the idea of calling me ``ji'' nauseating (as I do). Sandip can be > ``-da''. > > On a more serious note, is this thread generating any fresh insights? I > admit it's been fascinating reading and I've learned quite a bit from > it, but it seems to be stagnating a bit now. Of course, that's just my > opinion, but if everyone agrees it could be time to move on. > > Regards, > > -- Raju > -- > Raj Bhaiyya, I quite agree with you on this one :P If others also agree we can conclude this thread. Actually I did put a Ji in front of you and Sandeep 'da' but saved as a draft and in the second drafting Ji got dropped. You know 'G' forces are always ahard to handle. and 6 G is too much :D Swapnil _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
